sistem_32 wrote:I agree. In my opinion, the three benefits of 3D printing are rapid prototyping, extremely limited production of a very specific part, or producing structures impossible to produce using any other technique. The horological uses, so far, don't seem to fall in any of those categories. In fact, the only possible benefit I can think of is reducing the labor necessary to fabricate the case, plates, and bridges, but economy just isn't a selling point for these $1k+ watches. Especially as the smaller, more demanding parts (i.e., the gears, springs, etc.) can't be printed, it simply comes off as a gimmick.
I definitely agree that it feels like a gimmick here. Another benefit is one off customizations that would otherwise require expensive retooling. Bespoke watch cases and the like. Not just modifying a stock part, but making something truly unique.
I could see modifying the structure for improved shock resistance. Multi material printers that can mix materials on demand could make for some interesting GShock prototyping or one offs. Not a cheap technology to use, but that isn’t at all the point here. I could definitely envision thinner/tougher GShocks using such an approach.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk